In the Company of Men was released on August 1, 1997, and is writer-director Neil LaBute's and Aaron Eckhart's first film together, as well as their first films. It was both written and directed by Neil Labute, and stars Aaron Eckhart, Matt Malloy, and Stacy Edwards.
I heard about this film a little while ago, before starting the list, and found it interesting, and decided to check it out. It was a little tough to find, being that it's an indie film from the 90s, from a director who hasn't done a lot of good stuff (The Wicker Man remake with Nic Cage, the American remake of Death at a Funeral). So, I put it on hold. When it came up on the list, I had a bit of trouble finding it, before finding it on iTunes (which should've been the first place I looked, considering their love for good indie movies). So, I bought it, and watched it.
Not many people know about it, and those who do, don't often talk about it. While the movie certainly is good, it's not really spectacular. However, the film has one amazingly good thing: Aaron Eckhart. I've never thought him to be a tremendous actor, but he's absolutely brilliant here.
The story goes, Aaron Eckhart met Neil Labute while at Brigham Young University who cast him in several of his plays, including In the Company of Men. After Eckhart moved to New York City a few years later, LaBute approached him, asking him to star in his film adaption of In the Company of Men. Eckhart agreed.
Without a doubt, Eckhart is the best thing about this film. He plays this sociopathic womanizer, Chad, who decides with his good friend Howard (Matt Malloy), while they are out of town for 6 weeks on a business trip, to find a self-conscious woman, both date her, and then dump her once they leave, emotionally scarring her. They choose Christine (Stacy Edwards), a deaf woman at their office. They both do this because of bad experiences they have had with women. Eckhart is the best actor of the three. The other two do good, but once you take Eckhart out of the scene, it's just not as enjoyable. I found myself being bored whenever he wasn't on screen. Which isn't very good for the other two actors. They do okay, they're not terrible, but not great either.
A good example of this would have to be a scene where Howard tells Christine he loves her. Without spoiling anything, the scene doesn't really end good for either character. However, it just didn't feel powerful until right at the end of the scene when Howard starts yelling. One good thing I can say about Matt Malloy is that he's a good yeller.
The writing is very good. LaBute is a great writer, and that's what keeps the film going whenever Eckhart leaves the screen. It's a real shame he decided to direct the Wicker Man remake. He could've had a great career, something like Todd Solondz, with this being his Welcome to the Dollhouse. (Speaking of Welcome to the Dollhouse, why isn't that on the list?)
Overall, Aaron Eckhart and Neil LaBute are the reasons why this film is on the list, and fairly so, considering how Matt Malloy and Stacy Edwards have gone nowhere, but Aaron Eckhart has done a variety of great films (The Dark Knight, Erin Brokovich, Thank You For Smoking, etc. etc.) and Neil LaBute had at least, directed some more films. Overall, this films gets a 7.5/10. Check it out if you're interested, I cannot stress enough how much of a good job Aaron Eckhart does in this film. Also, one thing I forgot to mention: the closing scene. Eckhart isn't it, but it's rather sublime. I've noticed that a lot of mute scenes are.
Next time, I'm watching Amores Perros, the first film in director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarittu's trilogy of death.
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
#494 - Sideways
Sideways was released on October 22, 2004. It won the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay. It was written by Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor, directed by Alexander Payne, and stars Paul Giamatti, Thomas Haden Church, Virginia Madsen, and Sandra Oh.
I'd never seen this film, but I always wanted to. I've always heard tremendously positive things about the film, and that is was also tremendously funny. While watching it, I got that feeling only for a few scenes. I overall found the film not to be tremendously funny, but when it is funny, it's damn funny. However, that was few and far between.
We meet Miles (Paul Giamatti), a failed author and wine connoisseur, and Jack (Thomas Haden Church), a failed actor, college roommates and best friends. Jack's about to get married, and Miles is the best man, a single divorce himself. Miles takes Jack on a trip through the Santa Barbara County Wine Country, where Miles plans for them to drink wine, play golf, and enjoy the scenery. Jack's plan are different. He wants one last fling before marriage, and finds this with Stephanie (Sandra Oh), a single mother who works at a local winery. At the same time, Miles enjoys a budding relationship with Maya (Virginia Madsen), a local waitress and fellow wine connoisseur.
As I already mentioned, I didn't think the comedy in this film was great. I found it to be rather circumstantial, it just happened to be there. This proved to be a major disappointment for me, as I kept hearing just how tremendously funny this film was. However, what this film lacked in comedy, I found it had in almost every other department.
The acting was spectacular, from the entire main cast. Paul Giamatti is brilliant at playing a pathetic, depressing person, who's had enough, but is too pathetic to do anything about it. Thomas Haden Church was probably the best actor in the whole group, playing a despicable, and yet loveable character who just wanted sex, sex, sex, and didn't quite care where he got it from. As Jack describes himself, "I'm an actor. All I have is instinct." Without spoiling anything, something bad happens to Jack. Due to what he's said earlier in the film, you think he would be depressed over this, but instead isn't, jumping right back onto the figurative horse.
The writing is rather spectacular in parts. It creates a truly depressing situation for Miles, and makes him seem so pathetic, and we take pity on him for it. I'd say out of all the films I've seen on this list, this one has the best writing. The directing is also good, with the cinematography being very good in some parts. I like how whenever Miles is drunk, the camera shakes a bit.
Quite frankly, I didn't enjoy the film, because of it's apparent lack of comedy, or at least, my lack of enjoyability for it. And that was sore. However, the film gets everything else right, creating a very enjoyable film, as long as you go into it with the right mind. Overall, I give the film a 7.5/10 for enjoyment, but I do expect this number to increase in the next few years.
Next time, I'm watching In The Company of Men, Aaron Eckhart's acting debut, and Neil LaBute's directing debut.
I'd never seen this film, but I always wanted to. I've always heard tremendously positive things about the film, and that is was also tremendously funny. While watching it, I got that feeling only for a few scenes. I overall found the film not to be tremendously funny, but when it is funny, it's damn funny. However, that was few and far between.
We meet Miles (Paul Giamatti), a failed author and wine connoisseur, and Jack (Thomas Haden Church), a failed actor, college roommates and best friends. Jack's about to get married, and Miles is the best man, a single divorce himself. Miles takes Jack on a trip through the Santa Barbara County Wine Country, where Miles plans for them to drink wine, play golf, and enjoy the scenery. Jack's plan are different. He wants one last fling before marriage, and finds this with Stephanie (Sandra Oh), a single mother who works at a local winery. At the same time, Miles enjoys a budding relationship with Maya (Virginia Madsen), a local waitress and fellow wine connoisseur.
As I already mentioned, I didn't think the comedy in this film was great. I found it to be rather circumstantial, it just happened to be there. This proved to be a major disappointment for me, as I kept hearing just how tremendously funny this film was. However, what this film lacked in comedy, I found it had in almost every other department.
The acting was spectacular, from the entire main cast. Paul Giamatti is brilliant at playing a pathetic, depressing person, who's had enough, but is too pathetic to do anything about it. Thomas Haden Church was probably the best actor in the whole group, playing a despicable, and yet loveable character who just wanted sex, sex, sex, and didn't quite care where he got it from. As Jack describes himself, "I'm an actor. All I have is instinct." Without spoiling anything, something bad happens to Jack. Due to what he's said earlier in the film, you think he would be depressed over this, but instead isn't, jumping right back onto the figurative horse.
The writing is rather spectacular in parts. It creates a truly depressing situation for Miles, and makes him seem so pathetic, and we take pity on him for it. I'd say out of all the films I've seen on this list, this one has the best writing. The directing is also good, with the cinematography being very good in some parts. I like how whenever Miles is drunk, the camera shakes a bit.
Quite frankly, I didn't enjoy the film, because of it's apparent lack of comedy, or at least, my lack of enjoyability for it. And that was sore. However, the film gets everything else right, creating a very enjoyable film, as long as you go into it with the right mind. Overall, I give the film a 7.5/10 for enjoyment, but I do expect this number to increase in the next few years.
Next time, I'm watching In The Company of Men, Aaron Eckhart's acting debut, and Neil LaBute's directing debut.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
#495 - Jailhouse Rock
Jailhouse Rock was released on October 17, 1957, and is Elvis' Presley third film. It was written by Guy Trosper, with story by Nedrick Young. It was directed by Richard Thorpe, produced by Pandro S. Berman, and stars Elvis Presley and Judy Tyler.
I'm just a general Elvis Presley fan. I enjoy his songs, just like everybody else, and I do consider him the King. I'd have to say my favourite song of his is An American Trilogy. I'm not religious, and despite this song essentially being a couple of hymns put together, I just can't help myself. I love the epic feel of it. It truly shows Elvis as one of the greatest musicians of all time.
This was the first film of his I'd seen. Of course, I've seen the famous Jailhouse rock scene, but I haven't seen the rest of the film. I couldn't even tell you the basic plot of the film. I simply thought it was just some generic musical with Elvis. However, I was wrong. This film was a great look into the entertainment business, and the mind of a teenage sensation, with some great songs thrown in, and a nice little love story too.
In this film, we find Vince Everett (Elvis Presley), a young farm worker. He is sent to jail a on a manslaughter charge for a fight he didn't start, but sure did end. In jail, he meets Hunk Houghton (Mickey Shaughnessy), a former country musician who teaches him how to play the guitar. When Vince gets out, he attempts to become the next big thing in the music industry, with the help of his trusty love interest and business partner, Peggy Van Alden (Judy Tyler).
Vince has only one thing on his mind: money. Money money money. All he wants is money. This is a very realistic portrayal of someone in the entertainment industry. It's also interesting to see a portrayal of a teenage sensation, especially in this day in age, with Justin Bieber. Despite the two films being completely different, I can't help but draw comparisons to Never Say Never, Justin Bieber's documentary film. In these films, both protagonists are young teenage sensations, sweeping girls everywhere. They're young, cocky, and their careers are rising. Fast. However, that's where the similarities end. Whereas I can understand why Vince Everett is popular, Justin Bieber, on the other hand... (and the nightmares begin again.)
Elvis is a good enough actor, all he has to do is play himself. Which of course, he's great at. Nobody can play Elvis Presley like Elvis Presley. Judy Tyler does a great job as well, and it's a shame that she died in a car crash right after she completed filming this film. I would've loved to see her do more films.
This film does have a couple of problems, which I won't mention, cause they're spoilers, and sometimes, Elvis' mouth can't quite get the words he's supposed to be singing, but overall, this is a very enjoyable film, for everyone, cause who doesn't like the King? Overall, this films gets a 9/10 for enjoyment. It makes me want to check out other Elvis films, despite no other ones being on the list.
Next time, I'm watching Sideways, a road trip with Paul Giamatti and Thomas Haden Church.
I'm just a general Elvis Presley fan. I enjoy his songs, just like everybody else, and I do consider him the King. I'd have to say my favourite song of his is An American Trilogy. I'm not religious, and despite this song essentially being a couple of hymns put together, I just can't help myself. I love the epic feel of it. It truly shows Elvis as one of the greatest musicians of all time.
This was the first film of his I'd seen. Of course, I've seen the famous Jailhouse rock scene, but I haven't seen the rest of the film. I couldn't even tell you the basic plot of the film. I simply thought it was just some generic musical with Elvis. However, I was wrong. This film was a great look into the entertainment business, and the mind of a teenage sensation, with some great songs thrown in, and a nice little love story too.
In this film, we find Vince Everett (Elvis Presley), a young farm worker. He is sent to jail a on a manslaughter charge for a fight he didn't start, but sure did end. In jail, he meets Hunk Houghton (Mickey Shaughnessy), a former country musician who teaches him how to play the guitar. When Vince gets out, he attempts to become the next big thing in the music industry, with the help of his trusty love interest and business partner, Peggy Van Alden (Judy Tyler).
Vince has only one thing on his mind: money. Money money money. All he wants is money. This is a very realistic portrayal of someone in the entertainment industry. It's also interesting to see a portrayal of a teenage sensation, especially in this day in age, with Justin Bieber. Despite the two films being completely different, I can't help but draw comparisons to Never Say Never, Justin Bieber's documentary film. In these films, both protagonists are young teenage sensations, sweeping girls everywhere. They're young, cocky, and their careers are rising. Fast. However, that's where the similarities end. Whereas I can understand why Vince Everett is popular, Justin Bieber, on the other hand... (and the nightmares begin again.)
Elvis is a good enough actor, all he has to do is play himself. Which of course, he's great at. Nobody can play Elvis Presley like Elvis Presley. Judy Tyler does a great job as well, and it's a shame that she died in a car crash right after she completed filming this film. I would've loved to see her do more films.
This film does have a couple of problems, which I won't mention, cause they're spoilers, and sometimes, Elvis' mouth can't quite get the words he's supposed to be singing, but overall, this is a very enjoyable film, for everyone, cause who doesn't like the King? Overall, this films gets a 9/10 for enjoyment. It makes me want to check out other Elvis films, despite no other ones being on the list.
Next time, I'm watching Sideways, a road trip with Paul Giamatti and Thomas Haden Church.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Midnight in Paris
Midnight in Paris was released on May 20, 2011, premiering at the 64th Cannes Film Festival 9 days before. It was written and directed by Woody Allen, and stars Kathy Bates, Adrien Brody, Carla Bruni, Marion Cotillard, Rachel McAdams, Michael Sheen, and Owen Wilson.
Yes, despite doing the list (as I have come to call it), I will still review current movies as well.
I love Woody Allen. Not just his films, but the guy as well. While I think it's kinda weird, to say the least, that he married his step-daughter, I love the fact that he did that, and can still make good films. It just shows that it doesn't matter what someone's personal beliefs are as, as long as they can do good work and make something people will like. Also, I love his films. Hannah and Her Sisters, Love and Death, I love them all. To me, Woody Allen films are a lot like pizza. When it's good, it's really good. When it's bad, it's still pretty good.
While his recent films certainly haven't been the best, you'll be glad to know that this film is rather special. A tribute of sorts to Paris, we meet Gil (Owen Wilson), a Hollywood screenwriter with has nostalgia for 1920s Paris. He's about to get married to Inez (Rachel McAdams), but doesn't know if he really wants to. When he and Inez tag along with her parents on a business trip to Paris, he discovers something interesting about the town, something nostalgic, and purely magical.
I won't spoil basic plot of the movie for you, even though it's quite easy to figure out by simply looking at the cast list. Just let me say that nostalgia is a major theme of this film.
The acting is rather good. Owen Wilson, an actor I've never had too much respect for, as it turns out, can play Woody Allen really well. he's gone up a few notches in my book. Rachel McAdams is also quite spectacular, playing a bit of a bitch, who only really wants to get married for the sake of getting married. The supporting cast also does great, playing their roles rather perfectly.
Woody Allen does just as great as he always does, with this film being his best since Bullets Over broadway, which was released in 1994. While able to get the drama of some of his better films, he's also able to get some great comedy in certain parts, reminiscent of Love and Death.
Overall, I find this film to be magically enjoyable. It's a very simple film, with a simple concept, handled perfectly. Woody Allen is at the top of his game again. This films gets a perfect 10/10 for me.
Yes, despite doing the list (as I have come to call it), I will still review current movies as well.
I love Woody Allen. Not just his films, but the guy as well. While I think it's kinda weird, to say the least, that he married his step-daughter, I love the fact that he did that, and can still make good films. It just shows that it doesn't matter what someone's personal beliefs are as, as long as they can do good work and make something people will like. Also, I love his films. Hannah and Her Sisters, Love and Death, I love them all. To me, Woody Allen films are a lot like pizza. When it's good, it's really good. When it's bad, it's still pretty good.
While his recent films certainly haven't been the best, you'll be glad to know that this film is rather special. A tribute of sorts to Paris, we meet Gil (Owen Wilson), a Hollywood screenwriter with has nostalgia for 1920s Paris. He's about to get married to Inez (Rachel McAdams), but doesn't know if he really wants to. When he and Inez tag along with her parents on a business trip to Paris, he discovers something interesting about the town, something nostalgic, and purely magical.
I won't spoil basic plot of the movie for you, even though it's quite easy to figure out by simply looking at the cast list. Just let me say that nostalgia is a major theme of this film.
The acting is rather good. Owen Wilson, an actor I've never had too much respect for, as it turns out, can play Woody Allen really well. he's gone up a few notches in my book. Rachel McAdams is also quite spectacular, playing a bit of a bitch, who only really wants to get married for the sake of getting married. The supporting cast also does great, playing their roles rather perfectly.
Woody Allen does just as great as he always does, with this film being his best since Bullets Over broadway, which was released in 1994. While able to get the drama of some of his better films, he's also able to get some great comedy in certain parts, reminiscent of Love and Death.
Overall, I find this film to be magically enjoyable. It's a very simple film, with a simple concept, handled perfectly. Woody Allen is at the top of his game again. This films gets a perfect 10/10 for me.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
#496 - Superman Returns
Superman Returns was released on June 28, 2006. It was directed by Bryan Singer, written by Michael Dougherty, and Dan Harris, and stars Brandon Routh, Kate Bosworth, and Kevin Spacey.
I remember seeing this when it first came out. I was 13 years old, and I remember my dad saying that he enjoyed it. I liked it, but thought that it was a bit long. Nowadays, it's generally thought to be average, leaning on negative. I agree with this, but I still enjoy it.
Let me start with the negative. Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane. To me, Lois Lane has always been a strong independent woman, and a good role model for young girls. They really screw that up here. Here, she is married (or in a prolonged engagement), with a young boy, sour over Superman leaving without saying goodbye, and whiny, not getting her stuff done. If Margot Kidder's Lois Lane wanted something done, she would do it, no matter what anyone said. As opposed to Kidder doing what needs to be done, Bosworth whines, mopes over Superman, and then goes for a smoke. Not a good role model for young girls. Also, I can't stand Kate Bosworth. You know how most people don't like the word moist, for no particular reason? Kate Bosworth is my moist. I just don't like her. *SPOILERS* Also, the whole lifting the kryptonite island thing is rather stupid, considering how it's made of kryptonite, and Superman can't be near it. Another negative for me is Frank Langella as Perry White. Perry White was a guy who wanted to get the job done, very similar to J. Jonah Jameson, but not as brash, and doesn't hate Superman. Here, he's quieter, nicer, and overall more friendly. Not the Perry White of the comics or former films.
Now, the positive. Brandon Routh. He ain't no Christopher Reeve, but he sure does look like him. And honestly, that's a big plus here. Christopher Reeve IS Superman. And he'll never be replaced. So looking like him isn't as good as the real thing, but it's the next best thing. Henry Cavill might come close in next year's The Man of Steel, but he sure ain't no Christopher Reeve. Brandon Routh does genuinely look like him, so it does help the transition. However, I think that if they wanted to go in an entirely new direction, they should've used James Marsden. That's right, Lois' husband in this film. If you ask me, he's the perfect Superman, aside from Christopher Reeve. But I'm happy with Brandon Routh just the same. Also, this version of Jimmy Olsen is hands down, the best Jimmy Olsen ever portrayed on screen. 'Nuff said. Also, Kevin Spacey is not the best Lex Luthor (that would be Michael Rosenbaum, from Smallville), but he's still pretty good, and he always does a good performance. Technically, he's doing the same stuff as Gene Hackman did years ago, but that's a good thing, as it reminds me of the original film. Parker Posey is also a pleasant addition to any film, including this one, as she always fleshes out her characters, and creates the most interesting of characters in her films, whether she's the star, or in a cameo.
There are two other things that make this film great for me. Without them, I couldn't enjoy this film as much as I do. The first is the opening credits. They're fancy, for 1975. Just like the credits of the original film.
The second is Marlon Brando. Despite dying a few years before this film came out, they were able to use his footage from the first film, combined with CGI, to give him a quick scene early in this film. I'm very glad that they did this, because it reminds me of the first film.
As you may have realized, I really like the first film. To me, that is the perfect Superman film, and there will never be another good one. Superman II came close, but wasn't quite as good. So, the main reason why I enjoy this film is because it reminds me so much of the first film. Forget the negatives, you've got a nice little tribute to the first film, which makes me happy any day.
Overall, for enjoyment, I give this film a 7/10. An enjoyable tribute to the first, with some negatives that do drag it down. And if you're wondering what my opinion is on the new reboot, I think Zack Snyder is style over substance, and this film will need both, especially substance, and Henry Cavill doesn't look like Superman. However, the rest of the cast is perfect, especially Michael Shannon as General Zod. I can already feel chills shivering down my spine.
Next time, I'm watching Jailhouse Rock, one of Elvis' most famous films.
I remember seeing this when it first came out. I was 13 years old, and I remember my dad saying that he enjoyed it. I liked it, but thought that it was a bit long. Nowadays, it's generally thought to be average, leaning on negative. I agree with this, but I still enjoy it.
Let me start with the negative. Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane. To me, Lois Lane has always been a strong independent woman, and a good role model for young girls. They really screw that up here. Here, she is married (or in a prolonged engagement), with a young boy, sour over Superman leaving without saying goodbye, and whiny, not getting her stuff done. If Margot Kidder's Lois Lane wanted something done, she would do it, no matter what anyone said. As opposed to Kidder doing what needs to be done, Bosworth whines, mopes over Superman, and then goes for a smoke. Not a good role model for young girls. Also, I can't stand Kate Bosworth. You know how most people don't like the word moist, for no particular reason? Kate Bosworth is my moist. I just don't like her. *SPOILERS* Also, the whole lifting the kryptonite island thing is rather stupid, considering how it's made of kryptonite, and Superman can't be near it. Another negative for me is Frank Langella as Perry White. Perry White was a guy who wanted to get the job done, very similar to J. Jonah Jameson, but not as brash, and doesn't hate Superman. Here, he's quieter, nicer, and overall more friendly. Not the Perry White of the comics or former films.
Now, the positive. Brandon Routh. He ain't no Christopher Reeve, but he sure does look like him. And honestly, that's a big plus here. Christopher Reeve IS Superman. And he'll never be replaced. So looking like him isn't as good as the real thing, but it's the next best thing. Henry Cavill might come close in next year's The Man of Steel, but he sure ain't no Christopher Reeve. Brandon Routh does genuinely look like him, so it does help the transition. However, I think that if they wanted to go in an entirely new direction, they should've used James Marsden. That's right, Lois' husband in this film. If you ask me, he's the perfect Superman, aside from Christopher Reeve. But I'm happy with Brandon Routh just the same. Also, this version of Jimmy Olsen is hands down, the best Jimmy Olsen ever portrayed on screen. 'Nuff said. Also, Kevin Spacey is not the best Lex Luthor (that would be Michael Rosenbaum, from Smallville), but he's still pretty good, and he always does a good performance. Technically, he's doing the same stuff as Gene Hackman did years ago, but that's a good thing, as it reminds me of the original film. Parker Posey is also a pleasant addition to any film, including this one, as she always fleshes out her characters, and creates the most interesting of characters in her films, whether she's the star, or in a cameo.
There are two other things that make this film great for me. Without them, I couldn't enjoy this film as much as I do. The first is the opening credits. They're fancy, for 1975. Just like the credits of the original film.
The second is Marlon Brando. Despite dying a few years before this film came out, they were able to use his footage from the first film, combined with CGI, to give him a quick scene early in this film. I'm very glad that they did this, because it reminds me of the first film.
As you may have realized, I really like the first film. To me, that is the perfect Superman film, and there will never be another good one. Superman II came close, but wasn't quite as good. So, the main reason why I enjoy this film is because it reminds me so much of the first film. Forget the negatives, you've got a nice little tribute to the first film, which makes me happy any day.
Overall, for enjoyment, I give this film a 7/10. An enjoyable tribute to the first, with some negatives that do drag it down. And if you're wondering what my opinion is on the new reboot, I think Zack Snyder is style over substance, and this film will need both, especially substance, and Henry Cavill doesn't look like Superman. However, the rest of the cast is perfect, especially Michael Shannon as General Zod. I can already feel chills shivering down my spine.
Next time, I'm watching Jailhouse Rock, one of Elvis' most famous films.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
#497 - Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was released on July 6, 2000 in Hong Kong, and December 22, 2000 in the U.S. It won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, as well as three others. It was directed by Ang Lee, written by Wang Hui-ling, James Schamus, and Tsai Kuo-jung, with story by Wang Dulu, and stars Chow Yun-fat, Michelle Yeoh, Zhang Ziyi, and Chang Chen.
I don't see as many foreign films as I'd like to, but I think I see more than the general moviegoer. Just looking at my DVD collection, I have the Millennium trilogy, Cinema Paradiso, Spirited Away. I'm sure that if you asked any random person, they probably haven't seen these films, let alone own them. Like I said, I would like to see more foreign films, which was a major reason for me in taking on this challenge. So I was glad to see that one of the earliest films on this list was a foreign one, let alone one of the most famous, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.
I have never seen this film before, and thought that upon watching it, I would think of it as only okay. Martial arts films were never really my thing, so my hopes weren't high for this film, despite the Academy Awards. However, I was proven wrong. This film was superb.
The basic plot of this film shows us in ancient China, where we meet Li Mu Bai (Chow Yun-fat), a great warrior considering giving up his sword, and Yu Shu Lien (Michelle Yeoh), his old friend. Right from the get go, we can clearly see that these two have feelings for each other. Mu Bai wants to retire from being a warrior, so he asks Shu Lien to give his sword as a gift to a mutual friend of theirs. Once it arrives there, it is stolen by a young warrior, who is extremely who has extreme grace and skill. The rest of the film shows the quest of Mu Bai, Shu Lien, and the young warrior, who I won't reveal, in case you haven't seen the film, despite the warrior's identity being revealed early in the film.
A major theme in this film is feminism, and women's place in ancient China. This is best exemplified in three characters: Yu Shu Lien, Jade Fox (Cheng Pei-pei), and Jen Yu (Zhang Ziyi, in her breakout role). Shu Lien is a warrior, and is seen as an independent woman by her young friend, Jen Yu. Jen is an aristocrat, the daughter of a governor, and dreading her upcoming arranged marriage. She longs for the excitement of a warrior, and seeks this through Yu Shu Lien, initially. Jade Fox is an old enemy of Li Mu Bai, she murdered his master. The reason why is because he refused to train her in the ways of Wudang, because she was a woman. It is not the way of the Wudang clan to teach women.
Now we have this brilliant plot, with great writing, great acting, and superb dialogue. That makes a great film right there. But what makes this film superb? The choreography. The martial arts, the fight scenes. It's the best I've ever seen in film. It's extremely graceful, with minimal violence. It's a wonder to look at, and if the film was entirely fight scenes, it would still be enjoyable.
Overall, I didn't expect this film to be great, but due to great writing and acting, as well as choreography, we have a truly great film. After watching, I'm genuinely shocked that this film wasn't later on the list. Overall, I give it a 10/10, simply superb.
Next time, I'm watching the fifth entry in the Superman series, Superman Returns. I'm not looking forward to it.
I don't see as many foreign films as I'd like to, but I think I see more than the general moviegoer. Just looking at my DVD collection, I have the Millennium trilogy, Cinema Paradiso, Spirited Away. I'm sure that if you asked any random person, they probably haven't seen these films, let alone own them. Like I said, I would like to see more foreign films, which was a major reason for me in taking on this challenge. So I was glad to see that one of the earliest films on this list was a foreign one, let alone one of the most famous, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.
I have never seen this film before, and thought that upon watching it, I would think of it as only okay. Martial arts films were never really my thing, so my hopes weren't high for this film, despite the Academy Awards. However, I was proven wrong. This film was superb.
The basic plot of this film shows us in ancient China, where we meet Li Mu Bai (Chow Yun-fat), a great warrior considering giving up his sword, and Yu Shu Lien (Michelle Yeoh), his old friend. Right from the get go, we can clearly see that these two have feelings for each other. Mu Bai wants to retire from being a warrior, so he asks Shu Lien to give his sword as a gift to a mutual friend of theirs. Once it arrives there, it is stolen by a young warrior, who is extremely who has extreme grace and skill. The rest of the film shows the quest of Mu Bai, Shu Lien, and the young warrior, who I won't reveal, in case you haven't seen the film, despite the warrior's identity being revealed early in the film.
A major theme in this film is feminism, and women's place in ancient China. This is best exemplified in three characters: Yu Shu Lien, Jade Fox (Cheng Pei-pei), and Jen Yu (Zhang Ziyi, in her breakout role). Shu Lien is a warrior, and is seen as an independent woman by her young friend, Jen Yu. Jen is an aristocrat, the daughter of a governor, and dreading her upcoming arranged marriage. She longs for the excitement of a warrior, and seeks this through Yu Shu Lien, initially. Jade Fox is an old enemy of Li Mu Bai, she murdered his master. The reason why is because he refused to train her in the ways of Wudang, because she was a woman. It is not the way of the Wudang clan to teach women.
Now we have this brilliant plot, with great writing, great acting, and superb dialogue. That makes a great film right there. But what makes this film superb? The choreography. The martial arts, the fight scenes. It's the best I've ever seen in film. It's extremely graceful, with minimal violence. It's a wonder to look at, and if the film was entirely fight scenes, it would still be enjoyable.
Overall, I didn't expect this film to be great, but due to great writing and acting, as well as choreography, we have a truly great film. After watching, I'm genuinely shocked that this film wasn't later on the list. Overall, I give it a 10/10, simply superb.
Next time, I'm watching the fifth entry in the Superman series, Superman Returns. I'm not looking forward to it.
Monday, June 13, 2011
#498 - Back to the Future Part II
Back to the Future Part II is the second instalment in the popular Back to the Future series, and was released on November 22, 1989. It was directed by Robert Zemeckis, written by Bob Gale, and stars Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Thomas F. Wilson, and Lea Thompson.
Everybody knows the Back to the Future trilogy. They're great, classic films, that many people love, including me. However, one thing that most people tend to agree with is that the second film is the worst of the series. It garners 64% on Rotten Tomatoes, much less than the first, and a bit less than the third. However, as a young child, and even nowadays, Back to the Future Part II was always my favourite. The reason why? We got to see the future, and an alternate timeline, or skewed timeline, as the film calls it. Also, this is the only films that deals with paradoxes, a topic I find extremely interesting. Don't know what a paradox is? Here's one for you. This statement is false. Try figuring that out.
This film is great. Once again, we have Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd playing their most famous characters, Marty and Doc. Here, the game is changed, because they go into the future. But due to an "old" enemy messing around with the DeLorean, they find that the present has been changed into one in which Biff is the most popular man in America. In order to undo this, Marty and Doc must go back in time, and try to fix this, and save the present.
I do honestly find this to be my favourite film. While the first certainly is the best, I always enjoy this one more. Despite the recasting, despite the added plot of Marty's problem with being called chicken, despite a lack of George McFly, it's still my favourite. The acting is great, the directing is fabulous, and there are many shots where a character will be in the same shot twice, which for 1989 standards, must've been extremely hard to pull off. Only Zemeckis, later director of Forrest Gump, could've done it.
Overall, due to the fact that this film is my favourite in the series, I give it a perfect 10/10 for enjoyment. Next time, I'm watching Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, which I've never seen before. I can't wait.
P.S. The sight of Michael J. Fox playing his character's daughter always cracks me up. :)
Everybody knows the Back to the Future trilogy. They're great, classic films, that many people love, including me. However, one thing that most people tend to agree with is that the second film is the worst of the series. It garners 64% on Rotten Tomatoes, much less than the first, and a bit less than the third. However, as a young child, and even nowadays, Back to the Future Part II was always my favourite. The reason why? We got to see the future, and an alternate timeline, or skewed timeline, as the film calls it. Also, this is the only films that deals with paradoxes, a topic I find extremely interesting. Don't know what a paradox is? Here's one for you. This statement is false. Try figuring that out.
This film is great. Once again, we have Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd playing their most famous characters, Marty and Doc. Here, the game is changed, because they go into the future. But due to an "old" enemy messing around with the DeLorean, they find that the present has been changed into one in which Biff is the most popular man in America. In order to undo this, Marty and Doc must go back in time, and try to fix this, and save the present.
I do honestly find this to be my favourite film. While the first certainly is the best, I always enjoy this one more. Despite the recasting, despite the added plot of Marty's problem with being called chicken, despite a lack of George McFly, it's still my favourite. The acting is great, the directing is fabulous, and there are many shots where a character will be in the same shot twice, which for 1989 standards, must've been extremely hard to pull off. Only Zemeckis, later director of Forrest Gump, could've done it.
Overall, due to the fact that this film is my favourite in the series, I give it a perfect 10/10 for enjoyment. Next time, I'm watching Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, which I've never seen before. I can't wait.
P.S. The sight of Michael J. Fox playing his character's daughter always cracks me up. :)
Sunday, June 12, 2011
#499 - Saw
Saw was released on October 29, 2004. It is the first instalment in the Saw series. It was directed by James Wan, written by Leigh Whannell, and stars Cary Elwes, Leigh Whannell, and Danny Glover.
The Saw series is one of my favourite horror film series of all time, if not my favourite horror film series of all time. What I love about the films are the twists, the traps, and Tobin Bell. The twists are always smart, innovative, and surprising (except for Saw 3D), the traps are always imaginative, scary, and in an odd way, impressive (except for Saw 3D), and Tobin Bell is always chilling, scary, and making you soil yourself (except for Saw 3D). However, something that many people don't realize is that the first film is extremely different from the rest of the films.
While Saw II-3D (that's the seventh one) were just filled with traps, gore, and exemplify torture porn, Saw doesn't really do any of these. Saw relies on horror, setting the mood, and great writing and performances. Actually, not every performance is a great performance. Leigh Whannell can get a bit too whiny by the end, but aside from that, there are great performances all around.
The basic plot is two men, Gordon and Adam (Cary Elwes and Leigh Whannell, respectively) who wake up in a dirty, dungy bathroom, chained to pipes at the opposite sides of the bathroom. In the middle of the bathroom is a man lying on the ground. Tape recorder in his right hand, gun in his left, and lying in a pool of his own blood. They have to figure out what is going on and how to get out of there before 6 P.M., or there will be deadly consequences.
The majority of this film is set in the bathroom, between these two characters, with flashbacks taking up some time. Because of that, dialogue is extremely important. And luckily, the dialogue between these two characters is believable, and realistic. The mood is also set with creepy shots and music, although some times, the music can be a bit too nu metal, at least for my tastes. The final piece of music, during the last scene, is brilliant, and has since become the theme of the series, and leitmotif of a major twist.
While the rest of the films set this series up as pure torture porn, this film remains a gem in the modern day horror industry, a truly horrifying film. I'm glad to see that this film was on this list, and this early too. For enjoyment, I give this film a 9.5/10. And to those who don't want to check out this film because they think it's torture porn, trust me, it isn't. It's horror, and a good one at that.
Next time, I'm watching a classic, Back to the Future Part II.
The Saw series is one of my favourite horror film series of all time, if not my favourite horror film series of all time. What I love about the films are the twists, the traps, and Tobin Bell. The twists are always smart, innovative, and surprising (except for Saw 3D), the traps are always imaginative, scary, and in an odd way, impressive (except for Saw 3D), and Tobin Bell is always chilling, scary, and making you soil yourself (except for Saw 3D). However, something that many people don't realize is that the first film is extremely different from the rest of the films.
While Saw II-3D (that's the seventh one) were just filled with traps, gore, and exemplify torture porn, Saw doesn't really do any of these. Saw relies on horror, setting the mood, and great writing and performances. Actually, not every performance is a great performance. Leigh Whannell can get a bit too whiny by the end, but aside from that, there are great performances all around.
The basic plot is two men, Gordon and Adam (Cary Elwes and Leigh Whannell, respectively) who wake up in a dirty, dungy bathroom, chained to pipes at the opposite sides of the bathroom. In the middle of the bathroom is a man lying on the ground. Tape recorder in his right hand, gun in his left, and lying in a pool of his own blood. They have to figure out what is going on and how to get out of there before 6 P.M., or there will be deadly consequences.
The majority of this film is set in the bathroom, between these two characters, with flashbacks taking up some time. Because of that, dialogue is extremely important. And luckily, the dialogue between these two characters is believable, and realistic. The mood is also set with creepy shots and music, although some times, the music can be a bit too nu metal, at least for my tastes. The final piece of music, during the last scene, is brilliant, and has since become the theme of the series, and leitmotif of a major twist.
While the rest of the films set this series up as pure torture porn, this film remains a gem in the modern day horror industry, a truly horrifying film. I'm glad to see that this film was on this list, and this early too. For enjoyment, I give this film a 9.5/10. And to those who don't want to check out this film because they think it's torture porn, trust me, it isn't. It's horror, and a good one at that.
Next time, I'm watching a classic, Back to the Future Part II.
#500 - Ocean's Eleven
Ocean's Eleven is a remake of the 1960 film, Ocean's 11, which starred all members of the Rat Pack. This version is directed by Steven Soderbergh, was written by George C. Johnson, Jack G. Russell, Harry Brown, Charles Lederer, Scott Corwon, and Ted Griffin, and stars George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Andy Garcia, and Julia Roberts. And it is number 500 on the list.
I have never seen this film before watching today, so I didn't know what I was getting myself into. I had high hopes for this film, due to the fact that it had a great ensemble cast, and that it was directed by Steven Soderbergh. Like I expected, the film was great. after all, it is on this list, isn't it?
The basic plot is two con men, Danny Ocean and Rusty Ryan (George Clooney and Brad Pitt, respectively), who decide to rob 3 casinos in Las Vegas, each owned by Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia). They set up a team of 11, including newcomer Linus Caldwell (Matt Damon). The game changes when Rusty finds out that Terry is dating Tess (Julia Roberts), Danny's ex-wife.
The interesting thing about this film is that despite the fact that it's a heist film, there is no gunfights. The closest thing we get to a gunfight is in the dark, so we don't see it. Regardless, the film is still extremely enjoyable, using humour and great acting in it's place. Also, it doesn't hurt that the heist is absolutely genius, throwing twists at you from everywhere.
I haven't seen the original, so I can't compare the two. However, I get the feeling that if I did see the original, I would prefer the remake even more. Now, because the films on this list are some of the greatest films of all time, I'm not going to do a score of how good they are, but instead, a score of how much I enjoyed them. For this film, I give it a 10/10.
Next time, I'm watching Saw, the first entry in one of my favourite horror series ever made.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
A Project
Today, I decided to set myself a goal. It won't be easy. It will probably take years. I might not complete it, but I'll try my best.
Here it is: at the following link: http://www.empireonline.com/500/ , you will find a list of the 500 greatest movies ever made, according to British film magazine, Empire. This is an idea I had been toying around with for a while, but never really got the courage to do. I am about to graduate from high school, and because of this, I'm about to have a lot of free time for a while. I have decided to watch every film on this list, in order, from 500 to 1. Some of these films will be harder to find, but I will do my best. And as I watch these films, I will write a review of each of them. I will do it on my own schedule, so I could have a review out everyday, or every week. If there is an entire film series on the list, but out of order, I will watch it the way it is on the list, not in the order of the films' releases.
I have also set myself a time limit. I must complete this list by August 5, 2015, which will be my 22nd birthday. I will have recently gotten my Bachelor of Arts at this point, and I figure that this will be more than enough time to complete this goal.
Wish me luck, and if any readers have copies of these films that you would like to donate, that would be more than welcome, and I would be eternally thankful.
Here it is: at the following link: http://www.empireonline.com/500/ , you will find a list of the 500 greatest movies ever made, according to British film magazine, Empire. This is an idea I had been toying around with for a while, but never really got the courage to do. I am about to graduate from high school, and because of this, I'm about to have a lot of free time for a while. I have decided to watch every film on this list, in order, from 500 to 1. Some of these films will be harder to find, but I will do my best. And as I watch these films, I will write a review of each of them. I will do it on my own schedule, so I could have a review out everyday, or every week. If there is an entire film series on the list, but out of order, I will watch it the way it is on the list, not in the order of the films' releases.
I have also set myself a time limit. I must complete this list by August 5, 2015, which will be my 22nd birthday. I will have recently gotten my Bachelor of Arts at this point, and I figure that this will be more than enough time to complete this goal.
Wish me luck, and if any readers have copies of these films that you would like to donate, that would be more than welcome, and I would be eternally thankful.
Friday, June 3, 2011
X-Men: First Class
X-Men: First Class was released on June 1, 2011, in the U.K., and June 3, 2011, in Canada and the United States. It was directed by Matthew Vaughn, written by Ashley Edward Miller, Zack Stentz, Jane Goldman, and Matthew Vaughn, with story by Sheldon Turner and Bryan Singer, and it stars James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Rose Byrne, Jennifer Lawrence, and Kevin Bacon.
Let me give you a brief history of the X-Men films. The first was released in 2000, and arguably resurrected the superhero genre. Sure Blade came out before X-Men, but Blade is a vampire killer, not a superhero. X2 was released in 2003, and was absolutely brilliant, much better than the first, and to this day, remains one of the best Marvel films ever made. Bryan Singer, director of the first two, left to direct Superman Returns, and Brett Ratner replaced him, directing X-Men: The Last Stand, in 2006. It wasn't as good as the last two, but without a doubt, was much better than X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which came out two years ago. Which brings us to the newest prequel in the X-Men series: First Class.
Initially, this film was supposed to be about the students, and the students only, with little to do with Xavier or Magneto. Thankfully, they took some stuff from the Magneto film they never made, and created a good film here. While not the best of the X-Men films (that remains X2), it's still very good, arguably the second best of the whole series. WARNING: Continuity in this film isn't the greatest. If you're a nitpicker, then do one of two things.
1. Think of this film like a reboot/reimagining of the series, as opposed to a prequel.
2. Don't see this film.
Let's start with the acting. James McAvoy does a brilliant job at creating his own character. I say his own character, because the Xavier we know and love isn't quite here yet. We've got a young one, one who has a sex drive, and very much represents the British 60s culture. He does a great job, and by the end of the film, he has become the Xavier we know and love. However, he won't ever be as good as Patrick Stewart was, but he does come close. Michael Fassbender, relatively new in the acting circuit, does a tremendous job. He's playing a young, angry, vengeful young man, who can move metal with his mind. He perfectly does Magneto, just as good as Ian McKellen did. I feel no sadness that we replaced Ian McKellen with an Irish hunger striker, because he does BRILLIANT. Speaking of striker (or stryker), there is a little reference to a certain stiker (one again, or stryker) in the film, that is hard to catch, but 10 points if you can find it. Also, if you're wondering, yes, he is in this film. A cameo only, though, but still absolutely amazing. The best scene of the film.
With the rest of the cast, first, I'd like to point out that pretty much everybody is Americanized, aside from our two leads. Banshee, originally Irish, is American. Moira MacTaggert, originally Scottish, is American. Azazel, originally demon, is- I'm not sure what he is, but for the sake of this review, let's just say he's American -American. It's a bit sad that they did this. However, all the actors do a good job. It's very nice to see Tony Stonem moving on to bigger things. (You're awesome if you know what I'm talking about.) Also, Beast looks pretty awesome. Jennifer Lawrence, in particular, is the most interesting of the kids in the film. Not only is she the one we spend the most time with, but she's also the most developed. We learn that she desperately wants to be accepted, and finds acceptance with Magneto. Kevin Bacon as villain and leader of the Hellfire Club, Sebastian Shaw.
The direction is great. Matthew Vaughn, who directed Kick-Ass last year, while not the perfect choice, definitely does a good job. While this film isn't as gory as Kick-Ass, he still does a pretty good job. The writing is great, particularily for Magneto. Not only is he one of the greatest comic book villains of all time, but he is all one of the greatest comic book characters of all time. The film is also filled with little references to the other X-Men films.
Overall, if you're an X-Men fan, comic, film, animated series, checking this out is a definite a-must. If you're not, you might find it a bit hard to watch, because the majority of these characters are people you don't know, including Angel, Banshee, Darwin, and Havok. If you don't know any of these people, this film probably isn't for you. While this film is an introduction to these characters, these are people you haven't heard of from the comics, more than likely. Overall, I give this film an 8.5/10, a definite a-must, but only if you're a fan of the comics, films, or animated series.
P.S. Azazel is extremely cool. He's a red Nightcrawler essentially.
P.P.S. Without spoiling anything, they killed off a a character that I found genuinely interesting, and thought was a mistake. They created an interesting opportunity with another of the kids by this guy dying, but didn't use it. That's why this film is an 8.5, and not a 9.
P.P.P.S. There is no end-credits scene, unfortunately, so leave when the credits start people.
P.P.P.P.S. Sorry for so many of these, but the trailer for The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo was with this film. I can't wait. :)
Let me give you a brief history of the X-Men films. The first was released in 2000, and arguably resurrected the superhero genre. Sure Blade came out before X-Men, but Blade is a vampire killer, not a superhero. X2 was released in 2003, and was absolutely brilliant, much better than the first, and to this day, remains one of the best Marvel films ever made. Bryan Singer, director of the first two, left to direct Superman Returns, and Brett Ratner replaced him, directing X-Men: The Last Stand, in 2006. It wasn't as good as the last two, but without a doubt, was much better than X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which came out two years ago. Which brings us to the newest prequel in the X-Men series: First Class.
Initially, this film was supposed to be about the students, and the students only, with little to do with Xavier or Magneto. Thankfully, they took some stuff from the Magneto film they never made, and created a good film here. While not the best of the X-Men films (that remains X2), it's still very good, arguably the second best of the whole series. WARNING: Continuity in this film isn't the greatest. If you're a nitpicker, then do one of two things.
1. Think of this film like a reboot/reimagining of the series, as opposed to a prequel.
2. Don't see this film.
Let's start with the acting. James McAvoy does a brilliant job at creating his own character. I say his own character, because the Xavier we know and love isn't quite here yet. We've got a young one, one who has a sex drive, and very much represents the British 60s culture. He does a great job, and by the end of the film, he has become the Xavier we know and love. However, he won't ever be as good as Patrick Stewart was, but he does come close. Michael Fassbender, relatively new in the acting circuit, does a tremendous job. He's playing a young, angry, vengeful young man, who can move metal with his mind. He perfectly does Magneto, just as good as Ian McKellen did. I feel no sadness that we replaced Ian McKellen with an Irish hunger striker, because he does BRILLIANT. Speaking of striker (or stryker), there is a little reference to a certain stiker (one again, or stryker) in the film, that is hard to catch, but 10 points if you can find it. Also, if you're wondering, yes, he is in this film. A cameo only, though, but still absolutely amazing. The best scene of the film.
With the rest of the cast, first, I'd like to point out that pretty much everybody is Americanized, aside from our two leads. Banshee, originally Irish, is American. Moira MacTaggert, originally Scottish, is American. Azazel, originally demon, is- I'm not sure what he is, but for the sake of this review, let's just say he's American -American. It's a bit sad that they did this. However, all the actors do a good job. It's very nice to see Tony Stonem moving on to bigger things. (You're awesome if you know what I'm talking about.) Also, Beast looks pretty awesome. Jennifer Lawrence, in particular, is the most interesting of the kids in the film. Not only is she the one we spend the most time with, but she's also the most developed. We learn that she desperately wants to be accepted, and finds acceptance with Magneto. Kevin Bacon as villain and leader of the Hellfire Club, Sebastian Shaw.
The direction is great. Matthew Vaughn, who directed Kick-Ass last year, while not the perfect choice, definitely does a good job. While this film isn't as gory as Kick-Ass, he still does a pretty good job. The writing is great, particularily for Magneto. Not only is he one of the greatest comic book villains of all time, but he is all one of the greatest comic book characters of all time. The film is also filled with little references to the other X-Men films.
Overall, if you're an X-Men fan, comic, film, animated series, checking this out is a definite a-must. If you're not, you might find it a bit hard to watch, because the majority of these characters are people you don't know, including Angel, Banshee, Darwin, and Havok. If you don't know any of these people, this film probably isn't for you. While this film is an introduction to these characters, these are people you haven't heard of from the comics, more than likely. Overall, I give this film an 8.5/10, a definite a-must, but only if you're a fan of the comics, films, or animated series.
P.S. Azazel is extremely cool. He's a red Nightcrawler essentially.
P.P.S. Without spoiling anything, they killed off a a character that I found genuinely interesting, and thought was a mistake. They created an interesting opportunity with another of the kids by this guy dying, but didn't use it. That's why this film is an 8.5, and not a 9.
P.P.P.S. There is no end-credits scene, unfortunately, so leave when the credits start people.
P.P.P.P.S. Sorry for so many of these, but the trailer for The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo was with this film. I can't wait. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)